Figurative
Language
Some
definitions and examples
Metaphor:
A metaphor speaks of something as though it were something else. There are
three kinds of metaphor:
Simile:
A simile is a particular kind of metaphor that speaks of something as similar
to something else. You can usually recognize similes by the presence of the
word "like" or "as." For example: Alice is a very beautiful
young woman: she is as pretty as a rose.
Hyperbole:
A hyperbole is an exaggeration so great that no one could
possible take it literally. For example: "He made my skin
crawl." (We don't expect that the speaker in such a case be physically
affected by her encounter with another person: she simply doesn't like him and
has expressed the extent of her dislike by exaggerating).
Understatement:
An understatement seeks to express a thought or impression by underemphasizing
the extent to which a statement may be true.
Understatement is the opposite of hyperbole and is frequently employed for its
comedic value in articles, speeches, etc. when issues of great importance are
being discussed. For example: "Jen had stolen his watch, put a dent in his
car, and kept him from spending time with his buddies. Needless to say, Jack
had acquired a less than favorable opinion of his ex-girlfriend."
Irony:
Irony involves making a statement that means the opposite of what it states
literally. Suppose you happen to be experiencing a streak of bad luck: your
house has been robbed, your cat just died, your best friend is mad at you, and
this morning you backed your car into a tree. You cry in exasperation:
"Well that's just great!" Clearly you don't mean that you're happy
about this sequence of events: you have just made an ironic statement. You may
also encounter irony in pieces of literature or anecdotes. One of the most
famous examples of literary irony is Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet: it is
ironic that the lovers die as a result of the plan that was meant to ensure
their spending the rest of their lives together.
Synecdoche:
In synecdoche a part of something represents the whole. For example: "One
does not live by bread alone." The statement assumes that bread is
representative of all categories of food. Or: "All hands on deck!"
The statement equates the workers with the part of the body that performs much
of their work-- the hands.
Metonymy:
In metonymy some attribute of what is being described is used to indicate the
whole. When referring to a king, for example, one may instead say "the
crown"-- that is, the physical attribute that is usually identified with
royalty.
Some
things to watch out for when employing figurative language:
Beware
of clichs! Clichs are usually forms of figurative language ("dead
as a doornail," "cutting edge," "an axe to grind,"
"a bone to pick," etc.). Clichs often contain antiquated or obscure
terms that do very little to clarify topics of discussion. If you say that an
issue is as "dead as a doornail" what does that mean? What does a
dead doornail look like? Is a reader who has heard the phrase a thousand times
going to take the time to make a comparison between the issue and the clich? „
Avoid extended metaphors. Occasionally you will come up with a metaphor
that illustrates your point so completely that you want to share your ingenuity
with the reader. A metaphor should make one point very quickly: its purpose is
to clarify and stimulate. Extended metaphors tend to make readers less and less
impressed with the comparison the longer it lasts. The same imagery just gets
redundant and uninteresting after a while.
Avoid
mixed metaphors. If you attempt to explain a point using a string of
three or four metaphors the reader is likely to get either (1) confused as to
which model is the most accurate, or (2) exhausted by reiterations of an idea
that they understood the first time through. If the reader is examining your
argument critically it is also possible that he will observe inconsistencies
among the various metaphors. In any case, you ought to be more interested in
discussing the topic directly; figurative language can help you along, but
should never become more important than the argument itself.
Thus,
you should never base an argument on figurative language. No analogy is
flawless. Things can be compared on certain levels but there is a point at
which every analogy breaks down. If your reader is paying attention to your
rhetoric he will be able to refute the thesis of your paper quite easily.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
(for more information)
Marius,
Richard. A Writer's Companion. New York:
McGraw-Hill Inc., 1995. 171-90.